2004.07.D.16 Feedback re -- An Important Analysis of Who Yahooshua Actually Is Created by James3 on 8/24/2019 1:50:40 PM Feedback re -- An Important Analysis of Who Yahooshua Actually Is
Greetings
I received the following in response to the article 1AD.04.07.12 "An Important Analysis of Who Yahooshua Actually Is"
>>> FORWARD BEGINS <<<
Hi James
In a sense I am now more confused that ever about your teachings and reasoning regarding the person and character of Jesus. If you are correct that Jesus is not the Son of the Father and not part of the trinity, it merely implies that Jesus was just lucky enough to be chosen as the foetus (another human being) to be fully anointed by the Spirit of God to enable Him not to sin.
This leads to the other logical conclusion that Jesus was in fact just another "super" human being such as other greats like John the Baptist, apostle Paul, Ghandi, Mohammed, etc. If one takes this argument a step further with regards to salvation, it means that God was dependant upon a "good" / fully obedient human being (sinless "robot") to help Him present a credible sacrifice for the atonement of sin. Therefore salvation is partly based upon man giving God a helping hand. This leads me to conclude that the sacrifice that God provides wasn't a supreme act of love and grace, but rather a co-production with another semi-god, namely a sinless man called Jesus.
Further more, all the other religions that deny Jesus as the Son of God are then also correct and all the conventional Christian teachings are a farce, as proposed by Judaism (refer Yochanan Mascaro's letter).
If I have missed the crux of your reasoning regarding Jesus, please correct me.
Regards
Jacques Basson
>>> REPLY SENT ON MONDAY 2 AUGUST -- A WEEK AGO <<<
Hi Jacques
Thank you for your email.
You raise some important and challenging questions.
I am running a course for the next three days and am rather short of time today so I may not be able to give you a detailed considered response before Friday.
Some points of clarification, I am NOT saying that Yahooshua is NOT the Son of the Almighty, I AM saying Yahooshua is a son like all the other created beings are sons of the Almighty -- refer the first chapter of Job, references to Israel being the Almighty's son, etc.
I am also saying that the spirit that was placed in Yahooshua was a spirit being who I understand to be the first spirit to be created and who had lived with the Almighty from creation to the time that spirit was placed in Yahooshua.
Yahooshua therefore had considerable knowledge and experience.
One of the important things about the spiritual war between the Almighty and Satan is that it is about OBEDIENCE -- the essence of what Yahooshua accomplished was to demonstrate that a human being COULD be obedient unto death if they chose and could live a life without sin.
From another point of view
-- what would it prove if Yahooshua WAS the Almighty?
-- that the Almighty is without sin?
-- what would the fake death of Yahooshua achieve
-- IF Yahooshua WAS the Almighty then he could NOT die.
-- Yahooshua MUST be a human being in order to be able to die.
None of this takes away from what Yahooshua accomplished
- in fact, it makes it more remarkable
- AND it gives us hope that we can also aspire to live that way
-- what is the point of trying to follow the example of a man who is not a man?
I hope this helps.
Apologies for the hasty reply.
Warm regards and blessings
>>> CLOSING REMARKS <<<
I have not yet formulated a response to some of the points raised by the writer.
However, I have a number of emails that I hope to post later today and in the next few days which will in various ways respond to some of the points in the above email.
On completing these I hope to return to this email and consolidate my response.
Warm regards and blessings
[MAKERATING]
The comment feature is locked by administrator.
Return